FanBoardHQ
Sign in
FootballBasketball

UL Monroe3atTexas A&M47

2023 · Week 3

Efficiency

Game-level Efficiency Breakdown

-25.3-12.70+12.7+25.3ULM — Off. field pos.: -2.9-2.9Texas A&M — Off. field pos.: +2.2+2.2Off. field pos.Points this side's offense added or cost purely from where its drives started, vs. a league-average FBS team.ULM — Off. scoring eff.: -16.9-16.9Texas A&M — Off. scoring eff.: +22.0+22.0Off. scoring eff.Points this side's offense added or cost finishing drives (given where they started), vs. a league-average FBS team.ULM — Def. field pos.: -2.2-2.2Texas A&M — Def. field pos.: +2.9+2.9Def. field pos.Points this side's defense saved or gave up in starting field position allowed, vs. a league-average FBS team.ULM — Def. scoring eff.: -22.0-22.0Texas A&M — Def. scoring eff.: +16.9+16.9Def. scoring eff.Points this side's defense saved or gave up letting the opponent finish drives, vs. a league-average FBS team.ULM — Possessions: 0.00.0Texas A&M — Possessions: 0.00.0PossessionsValue of having more or fewer real possessions than the opponent this game (onside kicks, half-opening/closing clock timing, etc.) — not offense or defense skill.
ULMTexas A&MBreaks the final margin of victory down into where it came from, compared to what an average FBS team would do in an average game — the five bars per team always add up to the real final margin. Click a bar for detail.

Running score

02652Q1Q2Q3FinalULM 3Texas A&M 47
ULMTexas A&Mhover for any point, click for the by-quarter breakdown

Box score

ULMTexas A&M
Total yards222557
Rushing yards127158
Rushing attempts3133
Yds / rush4.14.8
Passing yards95399
Passing attempts1740
Yds / pass5.610.0
First downs828
Turnovers00
Penalties68
Penalty yards5550
Sacks22
Time of possession25:3134:29

Passing & rushing

What each offense did this game.

ULM
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(12)58% / 42%33%11.6
Q2(11)45% / 55%9%3.4
Q3(8)38% / 63%13%1.4
Q4(16)19% / 81%38%3.4
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 133rd on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(7)11.429%9.6
2nd(3)15.00%3.3
3rd(8)9.30%1.6
All (18)—11%5.0
Rushing by down(offense 107th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(11)10.527%3.2
2nd(12)9.133%4.5
3rd(4)4.525%5.0
4th(2)1.0100%21.0
All (29)—34%5.2
Texas A&M
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(18)56% / 44%50%8.3
Q2(21)62% / 38%57%10.4
Q3(20)45% / 55%65%6.4
Q4(13)69% / 31%62%5.5
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 43rd on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(16)10.950%7.6
2nd(16)8.463%10.5
3rd(9)6.767%11.3
All (41)—59%9.5
Rushing by down(offense 46th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(18)9.961%6.2
2nd(8)7.050%4.5
3rd(5)3.660%5.8
All (31)—58%5.7

Drive-by-drive — expected vs. actual points, each possession

2Drive 2: own 23 → FG4Drive 4: own 10 → TD6Drive 6: own 26 → TD8Drive 8: own 27 → FG10Drive 10: own 37 → TD12Drive 12: opp 49 → FG14Drive 14: own 40 → TD16Drive 16: own 37 → Punt18Drive 18: opp 41 → TD20Drive 20: own 47 → FG22Drive 22: own 14 → —own 0own 2550opp 25opp 0
Texas A&M drives by field position

Each bar is a drive, from where it started to where it ended. Green = scored, red = turnover/downs/safety.

#StartTimePlaysYdsResultExpPts+/−
2own 23Q1 13:301274FG1.83+1.2
4own 10Q1 6:04975TD1.57+5.5
6own 26Q2 13:09984TD2.07+5.0
8own 27Q2 7:32967FG2.13+0.9
10own 37Q2 2:00667TD2.47+4.6
12opp 49Q3 14:54834FG2.83+0.2
14own 40Q3 9:25870TD2.67+4.4
16own 37Q3 4:51924Punt2.40-2.4
18opp 41Q4 14:09846TD3.27+3.8
20own 47Q4 9:45719FG2.83+0.2
22own 14Q4 0:0027—1.60-1.6
11 drives7555725.047+22.0

Exp = points an average offense scores from that starting spot. +/− = actual minus expected.