FanBoardHQ
Sign in
FootballBasketball

UT Rio Grande Valley16atUTSA45

2026 · Week 1

Efficiency

Game-level Efficiency Breakdown

-12.5-6.20+6.2+12.5UT Rio Grande Valley — Off. field pos.: -7.1-7.1UTSA — Off. field pos.: +3.8+3.8Off. field pos.Points this side's offense added or cost purely from where its drives started, vs. a league-average FBS team.UT Rio Grande Valley — Off. scoring eff.: -10.9-10.9UTSA — Off. scoring eff.: +9.9+9.9Off. scoring eff.Points this side's offense added or cost finishing drives (given where they started), vs. a league-average FBS team.UT Rio Grande Valley — Def. field pos.: -3.8-3.8UTSA — Def. field pos.: +7.1+7.1Def. field pos.Points this side's defense saved or gave up in starting field position allowed, vs. a league-average FBS team.UT Rio Grande Valley — Def. scoring eff.: -9.9-9.9UTSA — Def. scoring eff.: +10.9+10.9Def. scoring eff.Points this side's defense saved or gave up letting the opponent finish drives, vs. a league-average FBS team.UT Rio Grande Valley — Possessions: +2.6+2.6UTSA — Possessions: -2.6-2.6PossessionsValue of having more or fewer real possessions than the opponent this game (onside kicks, half-opening/closing clock timing, etc.) — not offense or defense skill.
UT Rio Grande ValleyUTSABreaks the final margin of victory down into where it came from, compared to what an average FBS team would do in an average game — the five bars per team always add up to the real final margin. Click a bar for detail.

Running score

02550Q1Q2Q3FinalUT Rio Grande Valley 16UTSA 45
UT Rio Grande ValleyUTSAhover for any point, click for the by-quarter breakdown

Box score

UT Rio Grande ValleyUTSA
Total yards422525
Rushing yards177250
Rushing attempts3429
Yds / rush5.28.6
Passing yards245275
Passing attempts4729
Yds / pass5.29.5
First downs2223
Turnovers20
Penalties1311
Penalty yards105115
Sacks01
Time of possession34:4925:11

Passing & rushing

What each offense did this game.

UT Rio Grande Valley
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(16)63% / 38%50%4.8
Q2(31)71% / 29%39%5.8
Q3(12)67% / 33%25%3.5
Q4(20)40% / 60%50%7.8
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(21)10.257%8.9
2nd(17)8.635%3.6
3rd(9)9.122%3.4
4th(1)7.00%-7.0
All (48)—42%5.6
Rushing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(12)10.042%3.6
2nd(9)7.022%5.9
3rd(9)5.056%9.7
4th(1)1.0100%1.0
All (31)—42%5.9
UTSA
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(16)50% / 50%75%6.3
Q2(11)36% / 64%73%13.6
Q3(15)60% / 40%47%5.5
Q4(16)50% / 50%63%12.0
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 24th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(12)11.375%9.8
2nd(10)6.480%15.5
3rd(6)8.50%0.3
4th(1)5.00%0.0
All (29)—59%9.5
Rushing by down(offense 11th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(16)10.375%9.6
2nd(10)5.750%7.5
3rd(3)1.7100%7.0
All (29)—69%8.6

Drive-by-drive — expected vs. actual points, each possession

2Drive 2: own 20 → TD4Drive 4: own 37 → Punt6Drive 6: opp 43 → TD9Drive 9: own 25 → TD11Drive 11: own 39 → FG13Drive 13: own 20 → Punt15Drive 15: own 35 → Downs17Drive 17: own 18 → Missed FG19Drive 19: own 39 → TD21Drive 21: own 39 → Punt23Drive 23: own 17 → TD25Drive 25: own 25 → End of halfown 0own 2550opp 25opp 0
UTSA drives by field position

Each bar is a drive, from where it started to where it ended. Green = scored, red = turnover/downs/safety.

#StartTimePlaysYdsResultExpPts+/−
2own 20Q1 10:03965TD1.77+5.3
4own 37Q1 5:06714Punt2.60-2.6
6opp 43Q1 0:24843TD3.97+3.1
9own 25Q2 7:00175TD2.07+5.0
11own 39Q2 3:23854FG2.73+0.3
13own 20Q3 14:48727Punt1.70-1.7
15own 35Q3 9:03831Downs2.60-2.6
17own 18Q3 1:451361Missed FG1.70-1.7
19own 39Q4 11:07371TD2.77+4.3
21own 39Q4 10:0942Punt2.70-2.7
23own 17Q4 6:04583TD1.77+5.3
25own 25Q4 0:032-1End of half2.00-2.0
12 drives5952528.145+16.9

Exp = points an average offense scores from that starting spot. +/− = actual minus expected.

UT Rio Grande Valley at UTSA — 2026 game breakdown · FanBoardHQ