FanBoardHQ
Sign in
FootballBasketball

Cal Poly7atStanford41

2024 · Week 2

Efficiency

Game-level Efficiency Breakdown

-18-90+9+18Cal Poly — Off. field pos.: +0.6+0.6Stanford — Off. field pos.: +9.5+9.5Off. field pos.Points this side's offense added or cost purely from where its drives started, vs. a league-average FBS team.Cal Poly — Off. scoring eff.: -15.6-15.6Stanford — Off. scoring eff.: +13.4+13.4Off. scoring eff.Points this side's offense added or cost finishing drives (given where they started), vs. a league-average FBS team.Cal Poly — Def. field pos.: -9.5-9.5Stanford — Def. field pos.: -0.6-0.6Def. field pos.Points this side's defense saved or gave up in starting field position allowed, vs. a league-average FBS team.Cal Poly — Def. scoring eff.: -13.4-13.4Stanford — Def. scoring eff.: +15.6+15.6Def. scoring eff.Points this side's defense saved or gave up letting the opponent finish drives, vs. a league-average FBS team.Cal Poly — Possessions: +4.0+4.0Stanford — Possessions: -4.0-4.0PossessionsValue of having more or fewer real possessions than the opponent this game (onside kicks, half-opening/closing clock timing, etc.) — not offense or defense skill.
Cal PolyStanfordBreaks the final margin of victory down into where it came from, compared to what an average FBS team would do in an average game — the five bars per team always add up to the real final margin. Click a bar for detail.

Running score

02345Q1Q2Q3FinalCal Poly 7Stanford 41
Cal PolyStanfordhover for any point, click for the by-quarter breakdown

Box score

Cal PolyStanford
Total yards229437
Rushing yards25119
Rushing attempts2032
Yds / rush1.33.7
Passing yards204318
Passing attempts3030
Yds / pass6.810.6
First downs1322
Turnovers11
Penalties64
Penalty yards4630
Sacks11
Time of possession25:3734:23

Passing & rushing

What each offense did this game.

Cal Poly
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(10)60% / 40%20%2.9
Q2(11)64% / 36%64%8.9
Q3(16)63% / 38%38%4.5
Q4(13)62% / 38%31%2.7
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(11)10.045%6.4
2nd(12)9.567%7.7
3rd(8)9.825%5.1
All (31)—48%6.5
Rushing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(12)10.025%1.4
2nd(6)9.817%2.0
3rd(1)6.00%4.0
All (19)—21%1.7
Stanford
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(15)47% / 53%60%6.9
Q2(19)47% / 53%53%7.2
Q3(13)62% / 38%31%4.8
Q4(13)46% / 54%54%10.8
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 82nd on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(9)10.078%9.0
2nd(12)7.750%13.3
3rd(7)12.143%8.4
4th(2)4.050%2.5
All (30)—57%10.2
Rushing by down(offense 52nd on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(19)9.542%3.4
2nd(7)7.943%6.9
3rd(3)5.033%6.3
4th(1)2.0100%6.0
All (30)—43%4.6

Drive-by-drive — expected vs. actual points, each possession

1Drive 1: own 25 → Turnover3Drive 3: own 36 → Punt5Drive 5: own 22 → TD7Drive 7: own 32 → Downs9Drive 9: own 27 → TD13Drive 13: own 40 → FG15Drive 15: opp 21 → TD17Drive 17: own 15 → TD19Drive 19: own 15 → FGown 0own 2550opp 25opp 0
Stanford drives by field position

Each bar is a drive, from where it started to where it ended. Green = scored, red = turnover/downs/safety.

#StartTimePlaysYdsResultExpPts+/−
1own 25Q1 14:59523Turnover1.90-1.9
3own 36Q1 8:505-2Punt2.50-2.5
5own 22Q1 5:031083TD1.87+5.2
7own 32Q2 12:001663Downs2.30-2.3
9own 27Q2 1:31773TD2.07+5.0
13own 40Q3 9:421141FG2.63+0.4
15opp 21Q3 4:43521TD4.07+3.0
17own 15Q4 14:09785TD1.67+5.4
19own 15Q4 6:131055FG1.63+1.4
9 drives6343720.641+20.4

Exp = points an average offense scores from that starting spot. +/− = actual minus expected.