FanBoardHQ
Sign in
FootballBasketball

Stanford7atUtah42

2022 · Week 11

Efficiency

Game-level Efficiency Breakdown

-25.1-12.60+12.6+25.1Stanford — Off. field pos.: -2.2-2.2Utah — Off. field pos.: +0.1+0.1Off. field pos.Points this side's offense added or cost purely from where its drives started, vs. a league-average FBS team.Stanford — Off. scoring eff.: -10.9-10.9Utah — Off. scoring eff.: +21.8+21.8Off. scoring eff.Points this side's offense added or cost finishing drives (given where they started), vs. a league-average FBS team.Stanford — Def. field pos.: -0.1-0.1Utah — Def. field pos.: +2.2+2.2Def. field pos.Points this side's defense saved or gave up in starting field position allowed, vs. a league-average FBS team.Stanford — Def. scoring eff.: -21.8-21.8Utah — Def. scoring eff.: +10.9+10.9Def. scoring eff.Points this side's defense saved or gave up letting the opponent finish drives, vs. a league-average FBS team.Stanford — Possessions: 0.00.0Utah — Possessions: 0.00.0PossessionsValue of having more or fewer real possessions than the opponent this game (onside kicks, half-opening/closing clock timing, etc.) — not offense or defense skill.
StanfordUtahBreaks the final margin of victory down into where it came from, compared to what an average FBS team would do in an average game — the five bars per team always add up to the real final margin. Click a bar for detail.

Running score

02346Q1Q2Q3FinalStanford 7Utah 42
StanfordUtahhover for any point, click for the by-quarter breakdown

Box score

StanfordUtah
Total yards177514
Rushing yards22279
Rushing attempts2636
Yds / rush0.87.8
Passing yards155235
Passing attempts2534
Yds / pass6.26.9
First downs929
Turnovers01
Penalties54
Penalty yards4550
Sacks17
Time of possession25:2934:31

Passing & rushing

What each offense did this game.

Stanford
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(10)40% / 60%60%7.5
Q2(9)78% / 22%11%1.8
Q3(14)79% / 21%14%2.5
Q4(17)53% / 47%24%3.1
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 97th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(10)10.030%3.6
2nd(12)10.18%0.9
3rd(9)9.822%8.6
All (31)—19%4.0
Rushing by down(offense 53rd on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(9)9.833%2.0
2nd(4)6.050%4.0
3rd(4)6.025%2.5
4th(2)6.050%5.5
All (19)—37%2.9
Utah
By quarterPass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(18)44% / 56%39%3.6
Q2(24)63% / 38%54%6.8
Q3(17)53% / 47%71%11.5
Q4(9)33% / 67%56%8.6
how play-calling and results shifted through the game — (n) = plays
Passing by down(offense 20th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(17)10.559%7.2
2nd(10)8.030%3.6
3rd(5)10.220%4.8
4th(3)5.3100%15.7
All (35)—49%6.6
Rushing by down(offense 12th on the season)
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(16)9.956%7.1
2nd(9)8.156%9.1
3rd(7)5.171%8.7
4th(1)5.0100%14.0
All (33)—61%8.2

Drive-by-drive — expected vs. actual points, each possession

1Drive 1: own 25 → Punt3Drive 3: own 38 → Punt5Drive 5: own 25 → TD7Drive 7: own 31 → TD9Drive 9: own 23 → Turnover12Drive 12: own 15 → TD14Drive 14: own 44 → TD16Drive 16: own 28 → TD18Drive 18: own 17 → TD20Drive 20: own 34 → End of halfown 0own 2550opp 25opp 0
Utah drives by field position

Each bar is a drive, from where it started to where it ended. Green = scored, red = turnover/downs/safety.

#StartTimePlaysYdsResultExpPts+/−
1own 25Q1 15:001235Punt1.90-1.9
3own 38Q1 8:1643Punt2.50-2.5
5own 25Q1 3:401364TD1.97+5.1
7own 31Q2 11:071069TD2.17+4.9
9own 23Q2 4:151157Turnover1.80-1.8
12own 15Q3 12:40867TD1.67+5.4
14own 44Q3 7:53656TD2.67+4.4
16own 28Q3 3:39472TD2.07+5.0
18own 17Q4 13:25878TD1.67+5.4
20own 34Q4 1:083-1End of half2.30-2.3
10 drives7751420.242+21.8

Exp = points an average offense scores from that starting spot. +/− = actual minus expected.

Stanford at Utah — 2022 game breakdown · FanBoardHQ