Conference USA

2022 · through CFP Finals

ConferenceSeasonThrough

Conference USA was the 10th-ranked FBS conference in 2022 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. UTSA led the conference, ranked 33rd in the FanBoardHQ CFP.

Projected Standings

Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.

Team	Efficiency rank	SOR rank	Conf. sched. rank	Overall record	Conf. record	Proj. conf. wins
UTSA	56	28	11	11-3	9-0	9.0
North Texas	75	82	10	7-7	6-3	6.0
Western Kentucky	55	62	4	9-5	6-2	6.0
Florida Atlantic	86	101	8	5-7	4-4	4.0
Middle Tennessee	96	70	5	8-5	4-4	4.0
UAB	67	79	3	7-6	4-4	4.0
Rice	113	104	1	5-8	3-5	3.0
UTEP	108	102	9	5-7	3-5	3.0
Charlotte	127	122	6	3-9	2-6	2.0
FIU	131	115	2	4-8	2-6	2.0
Louisiana Tech	115	120	7	3-9	2-6	2.0

Head-to-head Schedule Comparison

Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.

	UTSA	North Texas	Western Kentucky	Florida Atlantic	Middle Tennessee	UAB	Rice	UTEP	Charlotte	FIU	Louisiana Tech
UTSA		L 27-48	L 28-31	·	L 30-45	L 38-44	L 7-41	L 31-34	·	L 10-30	L 7-51
North Texas	W 48-27		L 13-40	L 28-45	·	W 41-21	L 17-21	L 13-31	·	L 14-52	L 27-47
Western Kentucky	W 31-28	W 40-13		L 31-32	L 17-35	L 17-20	L 10-45	·	L 7-59	L 0-73	·
Florida Atlantic	·	W 45-28	W 32-31		W 49-21	L 17-24	L 14-17	W 24-21	L 13-43	L 7-52	·
Middle Tennessee	W 45-30	·	W 35-17	L 21-49		W 41-14	·	L 13-24	L 14-24	L 28-33	W 40-24
UAB	W 44-38	L 21-41	W 20-17	W 24-17	L 14-41		W 28-24	·	L 20-34	·	L 27-37
Rice	W 41-7	W 21-17	W 45-10	W 17-14	·	L 24-28		L 30-37	W 56-23	·	L 41-42
UTEP	W 34-31	W 31-13	·	L 21-24	W 24-13	·	W 37-30		L 35-41	L 6-40	W 41-31
Charlotte	·	·	W 59-7	W 43-13	W 24-14	W 34-20	L 23-56	W 41-35		W 34-15	L 21-26
FIU	W 30-10	W 52-14	W 73-0	W 52-7	W 33-28	·	·	W 40-6	L 15-34		L 34-42
Louisiana Tech	W 51-7	W 47-27	·	·	L 24-40	W 37-27	W 42-41	L 31-41	W 26-21	W 42-34
Exp. wins for a #25 team	7.7	7.1	6.8	6.9	6.8	6.7	6.5	7.0	6.8	6.6	6.9
Conf. sched. difficulty rank	11th	10th	4th	8th	5th	3rd	1st	9th	6th	2nd	7th
Projected conf. wins	9.0	6.0	6.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.0	2.0
Conference record	9-0	6-3	6-2	4-4	4-4	4-4	3-5	3-5	2-6	2-6	2-6

Conference win total projections

Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.

Team	0 wins	1 win	2 wins	3 wins	4 wins	5 wins	6 wins	7 wins	8 wins	9 wins
UTSA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%
North Texas	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
Western Kentucky	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
Florida Atlantic	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
Middle Tennessee	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
UAB	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
Rice	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
UTEP	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
Charlotte	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
FIU	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
Louisiana Tech	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—

Every model rank

Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.

	Offensive Eff			Defensive Eff			Overall Efficiency
Team	Pass O Eff	Rush O Eff	Total Off Eff	Pass D Eff	Rush D Eff	Total Def Eff	Overall Eff
UTSA	16	69	36	80	54	73	56
North Texas	18	103	44	78	129	108	75
Western Kentucky	30	72	48	39	83	64	55
Florida Atlantic	92	91	74	81	85	101	86
Middle Tennessee	104	119	86	90	53	96	96
UAB	51	24	55	42	120	72	67
Rice	110	113	82	109	134	119	113
UTEP	96	98	99	129	109	116	108
Charlotte	71	92	75	137	136	131	127
FIU	126	93	127	118	126	128	131
Louisiana Tech	94	130	104	82	130	111	115

Compare teams

Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.

UTSANorth Texas

Further from center = better (FBS percentile).

Quadrant records

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Overall
UTSA	0-1	0-0	3-2	8-0	11-3
North Texas	0-0	1-2	0-3	6-2	7-7
Western Kentucky	0-0	0-2	2-1	7-2	9-5
Florida Atlantic	0-0	0-1	0-4	5-2	5-7
Middle Tennessee	0-0	0-1	1-3	7-1	8-5
UAB	0-1	0-1	0-3	7-1	7-6
Rice	0-1	0-2	0-3	5-2	5-8
UTEP	0-1	0-1	1-0	4-5	5-7
Charlotte	0-0	0-2	1-3	2-4	3-9
FIU	0-0	0-1	0-2	4-5	4-8
Louisiana Tech	0-1	0-2	0-2	3-4	3-9

Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating

Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.

Team	Week 0	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	Week 8	Week 9	Week 10	Week 11	Week 12	Week 13	Week 14
UTSA		-0.5	3.3	4.2	-9.5	8.9	4.3	-0.3	-3.7		1.3	23.4	23.7	-11.6	12.8
North Texas		-29.9	1.4	-36.6	-8.4	11.3		-0.8	3.9	30.5	8.1	-19.1		-13.2	-12.6
Western Kentucky	-6.1	8.1		-2.7	20.9	-7.5	3.5	14.8	0.7	-30.3	21.7	19.5	-14.7	-1.1
Florida Atlantic	-3.7	-4.2	14.9	-19.9	4.9	-20.9		-14.2	-11.3	3.9		11.8	-32.0	-0.9
Middle Tennessee		-26.0	4.9	16.9	11.8	-13.0	-37.3	-18.9		1.6	-27.5	-12.9	18.1	-17.2
UAB		9.7	-8.4	4.4		-17.9	24.9	-9.0	3.1	-10.0	2.4	15.3	-10.9	-1.5
Rice		-28.2	-3.0	8.0	-2.1	3.2		-6.3	-9.0	-54.7	-7.2	-30.1	-34.4	-5.0
UTEP		-18.3	-12.3	-33.3	9.1	-9.6	-26.4		-7.7	-22.6	-20.4		13.4	2.4
Charlotte	-23.2	-24.8	-29.8	-0.8	-25.5	-24.5		-12.2	-63.6	19.1	-38.8	-16.1	-12.4
FIU		-28.4	-35.6		-43.8	2.1	-38.4	-22.7	15.7	-17.1	-38.6	-44.6	-53.3	-17.6
Louisiana Tech		-13.1	5.1	-11.6	-29.9		-2.0	-18.2	-20.8	-25.1	4.3	-34.9	-23.9	-14.0