Conference USA
2024 · through CFP Finals
Conference USA was the 11th-ranked FBS conference in 2024 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Sam Houston led the conference, ranked 56th in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacksonville State | 81 | 65 | 10 | 9-5 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Sam Houston | 96 | 43 | 6 | 10-3 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Western Kentucky | 90 | 74 | 9 | 8-6 | 6-3 | 6.0 |
| Liberty | 104 | 69 | 8 | 8-4 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Louisiana Tech | 117 | 108 | 4 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| FIU | 108 | 115 | 5 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| UTEP | 128 | 125 | 7 | 3-9 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Kennesaw State | 129 | 131 | 2 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Middle Tennessee | 132 | 124 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| New Mexico State | 130 | 127 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacksonville State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Sam Houston | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Western Kentucky | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Liberty | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Louisiana Tech | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| FIU | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| UTEP | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Kennesaw State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Middle Tennessee | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| New Mexico State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Jacksonville State | 70 | 50 | 52 | 85 | 120 | 102 | 81 |
| Sam Houston | 104 | 110 | 120 | 36 | 102 | 58 | 96 |
| Western Kentucky | 61 | 130 | 97 | 87 | 130 | 82 | 90 |
| Liberty | 119 | 44 | 106 | 111 | 90 | 101 | 104 |
| Louisiana Tech | 126 | 137 | 130 | 56 | 72 | 80 | 117 |
| FIU | 83 | 131 | 122 | 52 | 107 | 91 | 108 |
| UTEP | 130 | 126 | 132 | 112 | 96 | 114 | 128 |
| Kennesaw State | 128 | 138 | 134 | 118 | 132 | 111 | 129 |
| Middle Tennessee | 99 | 136 | 124 | 137 | 131 | 134 | 132 |
| New Mexico State | 137 | 114 | 131 | 128 | 121 | 123 | 130 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacksonville State | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 9-2 | 9-5 |
| Sam Houston | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 9-1 | 10-3 |
| Western Kentucky | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 8-2 | 8-6 |
| Liberty | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 8-4 |
| Louisiana Tech | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 5-8 |
| FIU | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 4-8 |
| UTEP | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 3-9 |
| Kennesaw State | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 2-8 | 2-10 |
| Middle Tennessee | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 3-9 |
| New Mexico State | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 3-9 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacksonville State | -42.5 | -11.5 | -11.7 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 4.9 | -6.1 | 1.5 | -9.7 | -11.5 | 2.8 | -5.7 | 28.3 | ||
| Sam Houston | 16.2 | -25.0 | 1.9 | -4.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 | -27.5 | -8.3 | -10.6 | -20.2 | -13.5 | -12.4 | |||
| Western Kentucky | -24.2 | 4.5 | 17.3 | -1.2 | 7.6 | 2.7 | 13.5 | -9.4 | -7.4 | -21.4 | -25.2 | -4.3 | -38.3 | ||
| Liberty | -15.5 | -15.7 | -7.8 | 1.5 | -13.4 | -25.8 | -15.8 | 0.6 | -12.1 | 7.5 | -6.0 | ||||
| Louisiana Tech | -21.7 | -12.9 | -34.8 | -18.8 | 2.6 | -24.4 | -21.2 | -10.5 | -7.4 | 1.0 | -12.3 | 2.9 | |||
| FIU | -3.9 | 16.7 | -33.1 | -18.9 | -6.6 | -9.3 | -27.4 | -10.8 | -3.5 | -3.5 | -23.4 | -16.7 | |||
| UTEP | -21.1 | -25.7 | -25.5 | -15.9 | -31.9 | -31.6 | -6.5 | -14.8 | -38.8 | -24.4 | -18.5 | -12.1 | |||
| Kennesaw State | -14.4 | -34.0 | -25.7 | -25.5 | -37.3 | -34.6 | -9.1 | -21.2 | -21.8 | -11.1 | -12.2 | -40.6 | |||
| Middle Tennessee | -13.6 | -22.7 | -53.9 | -31.4 | -13.5 | -45.4 | -18.4 | -26.3 | -12.5 | -40.7 | -46.6 | -24.1 | |||
| New Mexico State | -15.9 | -19.4 | -38.5 | -26.6 | -31.8 | -32.2 | -13.4 | -32.2 | -23.3 | -14.9 | -6.5 | -34.2 |