Middle Tennessee
Middle Tennessee State University · 2025 · Conference USA
Middle Tennessee went 3-9 and was ranked 129th in the FanBoardHQ CFP Rankings (blended resume and efficiency). Their 121st-ranked defense carried them, with a 126th-ranked offense. They passed the ball on 63% of offensive plays with a 109th-ranked passing attack and ran the ball on the remaining 37% of plays with a 94th-ranked rushing attack.
Quadrant record
By opponent strength, adjusted for where the game was played.
Projected wins
Per-game win probabilities combined across the full schedule.
The resume
Every game on the schedule. Click a row for the game breakdown (played) or the matchup projection (upcoming).
| Wk | Opponent | Conf | Opp rank | Result | Exp. margin | Win prob | GameScore | Quad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Austin Peay | UAC | — | L 14–34 | -5.7 | 0% | -34.5 | Q4 |
| 2 | @ Wisconsin | Big Ten | #74 | L 10–42 | -23.9 | 0% | -31.2 | Q3 |
| 3 | @ Nevada | Mountain West | #125 | W 14–13 | -5.5 | 100% | -13.6 | Q4 |
| 4 | vs Marshall | Sun Belt | #96 | L 28–42 | -11.2 | 0% | -23.1 | Q4 |
| 5 | @ Kennesaw State | Conference USA | #61 | L 16–24 | -16.2 | 0% | -11.3 | Q4 |
| 7 | vs Missouri State | Conference USA | #85 | L 20–22 | -8.4 | 0% | -15.3 | Q4 |
| 9 | @ Delaware | Conference USA | #98 | L 28–31 | -7.6 | 0% | -15.4 | Q4 |
| 10 | vs Jacksonville State | Conference USA | #83 | L 21–24 | -5.7 | 0% | -17.7 | Q4 |
| 11 | vs FIU | Conference USA | #89 | L 30–56 | -5.2 | 0% | -38.7 | Q4 |
| 12 | @ Western Kentucky | Conference USA | #68 | L 26–42 | -17.0 | 0% | -18.3 | Q3 |
| 13 | vs Sam Houston | Conference USA | #133 | W 31–17 | +9.4 | 100% | -11.5 | Q4 |
| 14 | @ New Mexico State | Conference USA | #119 | W 31–24 | -8.1 | 100% | -11.0 | Q4 |
12 played · 3-9. Expected margin and gamescore use the latest ratings — a completed game shows what the model would say now, not that week.
The season
The model’s read on Middle Tennessee, recomputed after every week. Toggle between overall, offensive, and defensive efficiency (each with a dot for that week’s game) or the FanBoardHQ CFP rank.
Passing & rushing
Opponent-adjusted, FBS-only. The bar is the blended Eff rank — EPA/play (scoring value), success rate (staying on schedule), and yards/play (explosiveness), each standardized against the FBS field. The three ranks below each bar are those components, so you can see what's driving it.
Their offense vs. what their defense allows.
Scored vs. allowed, all regular-season games.
What kind of team is this?
Every team by offensive and defensive efficiency (points/game vs. an average team, higher is better on both). Click a dot for that team.
Field position 128th · Finishing 124th
Field position 52nd · Finishing 125th
1.77 points per drive on offense, 2.23 allowed — starting, on average, at their own 29.
Play-calling & efficiency
What the offense did, by quarter and by down — raw, not opponent-adjusted.
| Quarter (att.) | Pass / rush | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1(185) | 56% / 44% | 44% | 6.4 |
| Q2(222) | 68% / 32% | 44% | 6.0 |
| Q3(202) | 59% / 41% | 45% | 5.2 |
| Q4(209) | 75% / 25% | 39% | 5.0 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(206) | 10.1 | 46% | 6.1 |
| 2nd(169) | 8.5 | 42% | 6.4 |
| 3rd(136) | 8.3 | 35% | 5.2 |
| 4th(19) | 4.5 | 37% | 3.3 |
| All (530) | — | 42% | 5.9 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(145) | 9.9 | 50% | 5.4 |
| 2nd(95) | 7.6 | 38% | 5.4 |
| 3rd(40) | 4.1 | 53% | 5.0 |
| 4th(8) | 2.6 | 25% | 1.6 |
| All (288) | — | 45% | 5.2 |
Middle Tennessee, all games.