FanBoardHQ

Wake Forest

Wake Forest University · 2025 · ACC

FanBoardHQ CFP
#43
Efficiency
+3.8
55th FBS
Record
9-4
Conf. record
4-4
Conf. finish
T-8th
of 17
Wake Forest Fanboard →

Wake Forest went 9-4 and was ranked 43rd in the FanBoardHQ CFP Rankings (blended resume and efficiency). Their 16th-ranked defense carried them, with a 98th-ranked offense. They ran the ball on 51% of offensive plays with a 30th-ranked rushing attack and passed the ball on the remaining 49% of plays with a 102nd-ranked passing attack.

Quadrant record

By opponent strength, adjusted for where the game was played.

Q1
1-0
Q2
1-3
Q3
2-1
Q4
5-0

Projected wins

Per-game win probabilities combined across the full schedule.

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Expected: 9.0 wins
Strength of Record
39th
-0.7 wins above a 25th-ranked team's expectation
Strength of Schedule
to date
74th
full season
74th
AP poll
Unranked
Conf. sched. difficulty
38th
a 25th-ranked team would win ~5.3 conference games on this schedule

The resume

Every game on the schedule. Click a row for the game breakdown (played) or the matchup projection (upcoming).

WkOpponentConfOpp rankResultExp. marginWin probGameScoreQuad
1vs Kennesaw StateConference USA#61W 109+13.2100%-8.4Q4
2vs Western CarolinaSouthernW 4210+27.6100%4.4Q4
3vs NC StateACC#35L 2434-1.90%-5.3Q2
5vs Georgia TechACC#36L 2930-0.70%2.7Q3
6@ Virginia TechACC#102W 3023+7.4100%2.9Q3
7@ Oregon StatePac-12#127W 3914+14.6100%15.5Q4
9vs SMUACC#31W 1312-5.4100%9.7Q2
10@ Florida StateACC#65L 742-8.60%-20.8Q2
11@ VirginiaACC#23W 169-10.0100%20.7Q1
12vs North CarolinaACC#103W 2812+16.4100%4.3Q4
13vs DelawareConference USA#98W 5214+21.8100%16.8Q4
14@ DukeACC#44L 3249-3.70%-8.9Q2
Postseason
vs Mississippi StateSEC#76W 4329+0.3100%15.3Q3

13 played · 9-4. Expected margin and gamescore use the latest ratings — a completed game shows what the model would say now, not that week.

The season

The model’s read on Wake Forest, recomputed after every week. Toggle between overall, offensive, and defensive efficiency (each with a dot for that week’s game) or the FanBoardHQ CFP rank.

-17.4-0.0+17.3-84-5331510-2121417-9Week 0Week 20
Line = the model's read each week; dots = that week's game (green above the line, red below).

Passing & rushing

Opponent-adjusted, FBS-only. The bar is the blended Eff rank — EPA/play (scoring value), success rate (staying on schedule), and yards/play (explosiveness), each standardized against the FBS field. The three ranks below each bar are those components, so you can see what's driving it.

Offense
PassingEff 102nd
SR 121stYPP 76thEPA 101st
RushingEff 30th
SR 61stYPP 27thEPA 23rd
Defense
Pass defenseEff 15th
SR 7thYPP 16thEPA 21st
Rush defenseEff 12th
SR 16thYPP 12thEPA 12th
Dropback rate 49%Tempo -1.2 snaps/game vs. averageFaced pass defenses ranked 70th on average
Success rate by down

Their offense vs. what their defense allows.

1st · Offense: 41%1st · Defense allowed: 37%1st2nd · Offense: 34%2nd · Defense allowed: 33%2nd3rd/4th · Offense: 43%3rd/4th · Defense allowed: 37%3rd/4th
OffenseDefense allowed
Points by quarter

Scored vs. allowed, all regular-season games.

Q1 · Scored: 86.0Q1 · Allowed: 47.0Q1Q2 · Scored: 109.0Q2 · Allowed: 59.0Q2Q3 · Scored: 82.0Q3 · Allowed: 84.0Q3Q4 · Scored: 64.0Q4 · Allowed: 89.0Q4
ScoredAllowed

What kind of team is this?

Every team by offensive and defensive efficiency (points/game vs. an average team, higher is better on both). Click a dot for that team.

elite bothdefense-ledrebuildingoffense-ledWake ForestOffenseDefense
Wake Forest Offense vs Defense, 2025
Offensive EffRanked 98th
-5.1
Field position: +0.2Finishing drives: -5.4
Field position +0.2Finishing drives -5.4= -5.1
Offensive Eff efficiency split into field position and finishing

Field position 52nd · Finishing 103rd

Defensive EffRanked 16th
+8.3
Field position: -1.1Finishing drives: +9.4
Field position -1.1Finishing drives +9.4= +8.3
Defensive Eff efficiency split into field position and finishing

Field position 106th · Finishing 6th

2.11 points per drive on offense, 1.67 allowed — starting, on average, at their own 31.

Play-calling & efficiency

What the offense did, by quarter and by down — raw, not opponent-adjusted.

By quarter
Quarter (att.)Pass / rushSuccessYd/play
Q1(211)45% / 55%40%5.9
Q2(221)57% / 43%43%7.0
Q3(171)56% / 44%40%7.4
Q4(231)44% / 56%35%5.1
how play-calling and results shifted through games — (n) = plays, season total
Passing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(153)10.345%8.7
2nd(142)9.132%6.6
3rd(111)7.936%7.2
4th(10)3.140%3.0
All (416)38%7.5
Rushing by down
Down (att.)Avg. to goSuccessYd/play
1st(215)9.938%5.5
2nd(118)7.236%5.3
3rd(72)5.551%4.4
4th(13)1.462%1.4
All (418)41%5.1

Wake Forest, all games.