ACC
2025 · through CFP Finals
ACC was the 5th-ranked FBS conference in 2025 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 2 teams in the top 25. Miami-FL led the conference, ranked 3rd in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke | 51 | 43 | 16 | 9-5 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Virginia | 30 | 25 | 17 | 11-3 | 7-3 | 7.0 |
| Georgia Tech | 41 | 31 | 14 | 9-4 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Miami-FL | 7 | 3 | 8 | 13-3 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Pittsburgh | 33 | 42 | 6 | 8-5 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| SMU | 26 | 32 | 10 | 9-4 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| NC State | 38 | 33 | 12 | 8-5 | 5-4 | 5.0 |
| California | 83 | 69 | 15 | 7-6 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Clemson | 40 | 63 | 11 | 7-6 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Louisville | 29 | 29 | 4 | 9-4 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Wake Forest | 55 | 39 | 7 | 9-4 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Stanford | 85 | 95 | 5 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Florida State | 37 | 81 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| North Carolina | 100 | 107 | 13 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Virginia Tech | 90 | 109 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Boston College | 99 | 128 | 9 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
| Syracuse | 111 | 114 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins | 10 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Virginia | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Georgia Tech | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Miami-FL | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Pittsburgh | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| SMU | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| NC State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| California | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Clemson | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Louisville | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Wake Forest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Stanford | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Florida State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| North Carolina | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Virginia Tech | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Boston College | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Syracuse | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Duke | 27 | 53 | 15 | 100 | 54 | 109 | 51 |
| Virginia | 63 | 40 | 55 | 21 | 20 | 14 | 30 |
| Georgia Tech | 21 | 18 | 45 | 66 | 60 | 47 | 41 |
| Miami-FL | 11 | 27 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| Pittsburgh | 43 | 83 | 34 | 35 | 9 | 38 | 33 |
| SMU | 30 | 52 | 46 | 45 | 16 | 15 | 26 |
| NC State | 22 | 9 | 23 | 43 | 34 | 62 | 38 |
| California | 58 | 105 | 83 | 36 | 106 | 71 | 83 |
| Clemson | 38 | 66 | 49 | 34 | 27 | 37 | 40 |
| Louisville | 68 | 3 | 48 | 12 | 39 | 28 | 29 |
| Wake Forest | 102 | 30 | 98 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 55 |
| Stanford | 96 | 113 | 99 | 59 | 40 | 66 | 85 |
| Florida State | 7 | 13 | 33 | 58 | 26 | 59 | 37 |
| North Carolina | 82 | 114 | 103 | 47 | 65 | 95 | 100 |
| Virginia Tech | 105 | 17 | 90 | 95 | 37 | 105 | 90 |
| Boston College | 60 | 63 | 85 | 88 | 86 | 118 | 99 |
| Syracuse | 124 | 86 | 118 | 101 | 50 | 75 | 111 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke | 0-0 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 3-0 | 9-5 |
| Virginia | 1-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 5-0 | 11-3 |
| Georgia Tech | 0-2 | 3-2 | 1-0 | 5-0 | 9-4 |
| Miami-FL | 5-2 | 3-1 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 13-3 |
| Pittsburgh | 0-2 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 4-0 | 8-5 |
| SMU | 2-0 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 5-1 | 9-4 |
| NC State | 0-2 | 3-2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 8-5 |
| California | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-4 | 5-0 | 7-6 |
| Clemson | 1-1 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 7-6 |
| Louisville | 1-1 | 3-2 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 9-4 |
| Wake Forest | 1-0 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 5-0 | 9-4 |
| Stanford | 0-5 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 4-8 |
| Florida State | 1-2 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 5-7 |
| North Carolina | 0-0 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 4-0 | 4-8 |
| Virginia Tech | 0-3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 3-9 |
| Boston College | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 2-10 |
| Syracuse | 0-4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 3-9 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke | 0.9 | -12.1 | -0.8 | 16.5 | 23.6 | 18.7 | -13.0 | 8.3 | -3.7 | -15.7 | 3.9 | 17.4 | 12.0 | |||
| Virginia | 18.0 | 5.1 | 15.8 | 19.6 | 7.9 | 15.9 | 4.8 | -6.8 | 9.1 | -5.9 | 29.7 | 16.6 | 3.7 | |||
| Georgia Tech | 6.9 | 0.8 | 6.1 | 11.4 | 8.3 | 9.0 | 25.0 | 13.6 | 1.2 | -3.4 | -9.6 | 13.4 | ||||
| Miami-FL | 27.7 | 9.4 | 38.5 | 22.8 | 24.1 | 4.9 | 20.4 | 12.9 | 16.3 | 34.9 | 17.2 | 37.7 | ||||
| Pittsburgh | 10.6 | 15.0 | -4.7 | 2.8 | 27.4 | 16.9 | 6.2 | 28.5 | 18.3 | -7.3 | 27.0 | -12.8 | ||||
| SMU | -0.5 | 2.2 | 11.3 | 2.3 | -1.0 | 17.6 | 22.1 | 6.0 | 23.8 | 20.0 | 35.7 | -6.4 | ||||
| NC State | 11.2 | 14.4 | 17.6 | -3.3 | -11.2 | 13.3 | 6.5 | -9.8 | 14.5 | -7.1 | 17.1 | 13.7 | ||||
| California | 11.4 | -12.9 | 7.5 | -25.8 | -1.4 | -18.4 | -9.2 | -4.7 | -2.6 | 14.8 | -25.2 | 14.0 | ||||
| Clemson | -0.1 | -1.1 | 9.1 | -26.1 | 26.9 | 27.7 | -2.2 | 4.3 | 20.5 | 15.1 | 2.4 | 20.0 | ||||
| Louisville | 17.5 | 20.4 | 11.5 | 18.5 | 6.2 | 30.9 | -0.2 | 8.6 | -8.2 | 3.8 | -15.1 | 34.0 | ||||
| Wake Forest | -8.4 | 4.4 | -5.3 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 15.5 | 9.7 | -20.8 | 20.7 | 4.3 | 16.8 | -8.9 | ||||
| Stanford | -3.4 | -6.3 | -2.3 | -14.0 | -15.2 | -11.1 | 14.2 | -1.0 | -13.5 | -11.8 | 15.3 | -16.0 | ||||
| Florida State | 30.4 | 18.4 | 20.0 | 12.7 | 10.2 | 2.9 | -10.0 | 32.8 | -3.0 | 15.8 | 1.0 | -18.9 | ||||
| North Carolina | -25.0 | -4.1 | 1.3 | -31.2 | -31.5 | -5.1 | 7.9 | 6.7 | -3.5 | -10.4 | -9.0 | -15.2 | ||||
| Virginia Tech | -8.6 | -8.9 | -28.3 | 3.0 | 13.3 | -5.5 | -8.2 | -6.2 | -3.9 | -12.6 | 1.1 | -12.0 | ||||
| Boston College | -12.9 | -2.0 | -12.9 | -12.9 | -30.4 | -30.7 | -22.1 | 1.4 | 6.1 | -17.9 | 0.8 | 14.7 | ||||
| Syracuse | -6.2 | -6.3 | 14.0 | 21.7 | -31.2 | 0.6 | -8.3 | -18.7 | -28.9 | -3.9 | -43.9 | -36.9 |