Mid-American
2022 · through CFP Finals
Mid-American was the 11th-ranked FBS conference in 2022 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Ohio led the conference, ranked 62nd in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 78 | 49 | 12 | 10-4 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Toledo | 76 | 66 | 11 | 9-5 | 6-3 | 6.0 |
| Bowling Green | 121 | 91 | 1 | 6-7 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Buffalo | 94 | 83 | 4 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 101 | 64 | 9 | 9-4 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Kent State | 100 | 95 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Miami-OH | 109 | 96 | 10 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Western Michigan | 120 | 105 | 7 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Ball State | 112 | 103 | 3 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Central Michigan | 117 | 112 | 8 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Northern Illinois | 124 | 123 | 6 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Akron | 122 | 127 | 5 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Toledo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bowling Green | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Buffalo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Eastern Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Kent State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Miami-OH | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Western Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Ball State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Central Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Northern Illinois | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Akron | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Ohio | 22 | 87 | 56 | 126 | 111 | 97 | 78 |
| Toledo | 55 | 85 | 79 | 31 | 75 | 75 | 76 |
| Bowling Green | 99 | 118 | 117 | 100 | 106 | 112 | 121 |
| Buffalo | 67 | 128 | 87 | 83 | 101 | 95 | 94 |
| Eastern Michigan | 73 | 81 | 66 | 101 | 118 | 113 | 101 |
| Kent State | 75 | 35 | 63 | 130 | 99 | 118 | 100 |
| Miami-OH | 119 | 104 | 118 | 110 | 64 | 86 | 109 |
| Western Michigan | 127 | 132 | 129 | 121 | 94 | 83 | 120 |
| Ball State | 129 | 114 | 126 | 61 | 104 | 79 | 112 |
| Central Michigan | 122 | 88 | 125 | 89 | 102 | 103 | 117 |
| Northern Illinois | 103 | 74 | 93 | 135 | 95 | 129 | 124 |
| Akron | 117 | 108 | 110 | 114 | 81 | 117 | 122 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 10-4 |
| Toledo | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 9-5 |
| Bowling Green | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 5-4 | 6-7 |
| Buffalo | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 7-4 | 7-6 |
| Eastern Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-3 | 9-4 |
| Kent State | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 5-7 |
| Miami-OH | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 6-7 |
| Western Michigan | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 5-7 |
| Ball State | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 5-7 |
| Central Michigan | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 4-8 |
| Northern Illinois | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 3-9 |
| Akron | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-6 | 2-10 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | -5.9 | -10.2 | -18.8 | -17.6 | -7.2 | 11.6 | 2.7 | -13.4 | 9.3 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 5.2 | -13.3 | |
| Toledo | -14.5 | 12.3 | -12.5 | -7.4 | 5.7 | 19.5 | 8.0 | -11.2 | -2.0 | -11.1 | -26.1 | -18.7 | 5.3 | |
| Bowling Green | -10.1 | -21.7 | -2.2 | -17.7 | -22.7 | -44.5 | -10.4 | 3.4 | -15.5 | -38.4 | 5.3 | -26.2 | ||
| Buffalo | -13.0 | -15.1 | -18.3 | 13.3 | -9.6 | 19.9 | 2.6 | -0.4 | -21.1 | -17.7 | -14.8 | -19.5 | ||
| Eastern Michigan | -11.6 | -26.1 | 10.2 | -30.9 | -21.8 | 18.6 | -46.7 | -8.9 | -11.8 | -5.2 | -0.6 | -0.6 | ||
| Kent State | -17.0 | -15.7 | -7.3 | 14.9 | -5.8 | -10.0 | -20.8 | -15.0 | -23.2 | 12.5 | -18.3 | -1.8 | ||
| Miami-OH | -12.9 | -31.1 | -12.0 | -2.2 | -11.4 | -12.3 | -19.9 | -23.4 | 5.6 | -21.7 | -11.1 | -14.8 | ||
| Western Michigan | -15.4 | -7.8 | -18.1 | -34.4 | 7.3 | -45.1 | -23.4 | -6.6 | -18.0 | -25.1 | -11.1 | -1.8 | ||
| Ball State | -20.7 | -22.9 | -13.6 | -15.9 | -17.8 | -11.7 | -12.0 | -15.2 | 0.1 | -7.0 | -20.4 | -12.7 | ||
| Central Michigan | -15.8 | -19.3 | -12.8 | 3.9 | -25.0 | -17.9 | -11.5 | -35.8 | -0.4 | -5.4 | -21.0 | -24.8 | ||
| Northern Illinois | -26.5 | -8.1 | -19.3 | -0.4 | -15.2 | -50.3 | 17.9 | -9.5 | -33.9 | -10.4 | -21.1 | -49.2 | ||
| Akron | -17.2 | -34.3 | -23.6 | -10.3 | -12.8 | -34.3 | -22.5 | -12.5 | -37.5 | -23.3 | 11.9 | -6.7 |