American Athletic
2023 · through CFP Finals
American Athletic was the 9th-ranked FBS conference in 2023 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. SMU led the conference, ranked 31st in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMU | 29 | 33 | 14 | 11-3 | 9-0 | 9.0 |
| Tulane | 58 | 31 | 13 | 11-3 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| UTSA | 61 | 52 | 12 | 9-4 | 7-1 | 7.0 |
| Memphis | 50 | 32 | 10 | 10-3 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Navy | 113 | 96 | 8 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Rice | 92 | 87 | 4 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| South Florida | 101 | 78 | 9 | 7-6 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Florida Atlantic | 106 | 114 | 11 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| North Texas | 108 | 101 | 1 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| UAB | 112 | 109 | 7 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Charlotte | 125 | 123 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Tulsa | 118 | 105 | 6 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| East Carolina | 110 | 130 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
| Temple | 130 | 126 | 5 | 3-9 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMU | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Tulane | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| UTSA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Memphis | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Navy | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Rice | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| South Florida | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Florida Atlantic | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| North Texas | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| UAB | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Charlotte | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Tulsa | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| East Carolina | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Temple | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| SMU | 15 | 93 | 36 | 14 | 37 | 36 | 29 |
| Tulane | 25 | 117 | 78 | 61 | 30 | 30 | 58 |
| UTSA | 64 | 90 | 71 | 41 | 50 | 57 | 61 |
| Memphis | 30 | 81 | 19 | 68 | 104 | 100 | 50 |
| Navy | 130 | 126 | 127 | 121 | 28 | 67 | 113 |
| Rice | 76 | 68 | 82 | 74 | 127 | 98 | 92 |
| South Florida | 85 | 100 | 88 | 129 | 55 | 107 | 101 |
| Florida Atlantic | 114 | 87 | 110 | 120 | 78 | 84 | 106 |
| North Texas | 74 | 43 | 46 | 107 | 138 | 129 | 108 |
| UAB | 71 | 29 | 74 | 49 | 137 | 128 | 112 |
| Charlotte | 128 | 116 | 130 | 63 | 102 | 105 | 125 |
| Tulsa | 63 | 124 | 107 | 127 | 120 | 108 | 118 |
| East Carolina | 126 | 129 | 125 | 81 | 24 | 66 | 110 |
| Temple | 108 | 135 | 120 | 133 | 115 | 126 | 130 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMU | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 11-3 |
| Tulane | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 9-0 | 11-3 |
| UTSA | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 9-1 | 9-4 |
| Memphis | 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 8-0 | 10-3 |
| Navy | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 5-7 |
| Rice | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 6-2 | 6-7 |
| South Florida | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 7-2 | 7-6 |
| Florida Atlantic | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 4-8 |
| North Texas | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 5-3 | 5-7 |
| UAB | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 4-8 |
| Charlotte | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 3-9 |
| Tulsa | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 4-8 |
| East Carolina | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 2-10 |
| Temple | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 3-9 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMU | 17.5 | 7.1 | 15.2 | -6.7 | 1.1 | 9.8 | 18.5 | 27.4 | 0.8 | 11.0 | 12.9 | 20.0 | 16.7 | |||
| Tulane | 18.9 | -3.8 | 6.6 | 11.7 | -4.1 | 17.2 | -2.8 | -2.0 | -6.1 | -18.4 | 16.8 | 11.8 | -4.5 | |||
| UTSA | -5.0 | 2.1 | -25.0 | -17.2 | -2.9 | 3.9 | 13.8 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 18.4 | 15.3 | -9.4 | ||||
| Memphis | -4.4 | 28.5 | -13.3 | 11.5 | 8.8 | -11.3 | 15.9 | -3.5 | -0.7 | -12.7 | 1.0 | 7.3 | ||||
| Navy | -30.5 | -21.3 | 3.0 | -25.8 | -10.0 | -2.5 | -11.6 | -34.6 | 5.9 | -5.4 | -24.1 | -13.0 | ||||
| Rice | -1.5 | -5.7 | 4.7 | -23.0 | -6.2 | -27.1 | 13.8 | -2.7 | 2.4 | -25.0 | 10.6 | -9.2 | ||||
| South Florida | -16.8 | -7.5 | 5.1 | 7.4 | 2.9 | -38.0 | -47.9 | -11.0 | -4.3 | -20.8 | -23.8 | 4.1 | ||||
| Florida Atlantic | 6.2 | -12.4 | -29.4 | -6.3 | -15.3 | 29.3 | -23.2 | 6.9 | -13.6 | -27.3 | -24.4 | -7.3 | ||||
| North Texas | -26.2 | -22.2 | -12.8 | -3.2 | -15.0 | 1.6 | -6.0 | -3.5 | -11.2 | -11.8 | -6.4 | -14.1 | ||||
| UAB | -2.7 | -19.2 | -35.5 | -4.1 | -7.5 | 15.5 | -17.3 | -25.7 | -9.9 | -33.7 | -13.7 | -10.5 | ||||
| Charlotte | -16.8 | -7.0 | -26.0 | -8.9 | -9.4 | -30.0 | -5.2 | -35.0 | -13.3 | -1.8 | -35.8 | -31.3 | ||||
| Tulsa | -23.5 | -11.2 | -22.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 | -9.9 | -36.1 | -42.9 | -20.5 | 4.9 | -20.0 | -7.4 | ||||
| East Carolina | -7.9 | -28.1 | -13.4 | 10.1 | -12.1 | -11.1 | -24.6 | -13.4 | -3.2 | 6.1 | -20.2 | -19.5 | ||||
| Temple | -22.8 | -18.3 | -8.2 | -30.8 | -37.5 | -18.0 | -33.7 | -29.7 | -0.8 | -9.3 | -21.2 | -24.7 |