American Athletic
2024 · through CFP Finals
American Athletic was the 8th-ranked FBS conference in 2024 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Army led the conference, ranked 28th in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army | 31 | 29 | 14 | 12-2 | 9-1 | 9.0 |
| Navy | 41 | 32 | 13 | 10-3 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Tulane | 34 | 44 | 12 | 9-5 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Memphis | 58 | 30 | 5 | 11-2 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| East Carolina | 98 | 67 | 8 | 8-5 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Charlotte | 121 | 95 | 4 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| South Florida | 94 | 73 | 7 | 7-6 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| UTSA | 85 | 76 | 9 | 7-6 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| North Texas | 88 | 90 | 6 | 6-7 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Rice | 100 | 109 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Temple | 127 | 116 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| UAB | 120 | 118 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Florida Atlantic | 123 | 126 | 11 | 3-9 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
| Tulsa | 133 | 128 | 10 | 3-9 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins | 10 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Navy | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Tulane | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Memphis | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| East Carolina | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Charlotte | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| South Florida | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| UTSA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| North Texas | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Rice | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Temple | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| UAB | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Florida Atlantic | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Tulsa | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Army | 103 | 16 | 12 | 123 | 63 | 76 | 31 |
| Navy | 20 | 8 | 37 | 81 | 68 | 45 | 41 |
| Tulane | 11 | 70 | 26 | 41 | 58 | 54 | 34 |
| Memphis | 90 | 48 | 46 | 97 | 71 | 66 | 58 |
| East Carolina | 101 | 49 | 110 | 122 | 31 | 93 | 98 |
| Charlotte | 109 | 88 | 103 | 121 | 105 | 127 | 121 |
| South Florida | 118 | 108 | 105 | 109 | 43 | 86 | 94 |
| UTSA | 88 | 92 | 81 | 91 | 69 | 84 | 85 |
| North Texas | 95 | 66 | 64 | 134 | 100 | 109 | 88 |
| Rice | 129 | 123 | 119 | 31 | 65 | 43 | 100 |
| Temple | 134 | 135 | 128 | 93 | 103 | 108 | 127 |
| UAB | 87 | 69 | 99 | 68 | 110 | 124 | 120 |
| Florida Atlantic | 122 | 60 | 123 | 110 | 101 | 113 | 123 |
| Tulsa | 136 | 129 | 133 | 136 | 106 | 130 | 133 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army | 0-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 10-0 | 12-2 |
| Navy | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 7-1 | 10-3 |
| Tulane | 0-0 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 6-0 | 9-5 |
| Memphis | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 9-0 | 11-2 |
| East Carolina | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 6-3 | 8-5 |
| Charlotte | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 5-1 | 5-7 |
| South Florida | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 7-1 | 7-6 |
| UTSA | 0-1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 6-3 | 7-6 |
| North Texas | 0-0 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 5-1 | 6-7 |
| Rice | 0-0 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 4-8 |
| Temple | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 3-9 |
| UAB | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 3-9 |
| Florida Atlantic | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 3-5 | 3-9 |
| Tulsa | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3-7 | 3-9 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 | Week 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army | 21.7 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 22.1 | 12.3 | 23.1 | 20.5 | 4.5 | 11.7 | -12.5 | -1.9 | 32.0 | -12.0 | |||
| Navy | -3.9 | 10.7 | 15.0 | 21.1 | 19.5 | 18.9 | -7.3 | -20.4 | 17.2 | -25.2 | 10.0 | 31.5 | ||||
| Tulane | 24.2 | 2.8 | -0.8 | 13.0 | 27.4 | 30.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 24.6 | 19.7 | 37.4 | -13.1 | -17.9 | |||
| Memphis | 15.7 | 14.5 | 0.9 | -4.8 | -13.0 | 9.6 | -1.5 | -13.9 | -12.4 | -5.4 | 12.6 | 26.4 | ||||
| East Carolina | -8.1 | 6.1 | -15.0 | -20.7 | 0.7 | -38.7 | -21.0 | -3.9 | 15.1 | -21.6 | 7.8 | -10.6 | ||||
| Charlotte | -23.6 | -21.0 | -29.8 | -12.5 | -5.8 | 14.4 | -27.4 | 0.5 | -32.9 | -36.8 | -2.0 | -16.0 | ||||
| South Florida | -10.0 | 2.8 | -0.2 | -15.5 | -24.5 | -14.0 | -8.2 | 6.2 | -16.7 | 13.7 | -1.5 | -16.4 | ||||
| UTSA | -14.3 | -28.4 | -9.1 | 5.0 | -13.8 | -9.5 | -8.4 | -24.3 | 10.2 | 5.5 | -5.3 | 9.0 | ||||
| North Texas | 14.1 | -2.2 | -37.6 | 15.9 | -5.6 | -10.5 | -2.1 | 2.1 | -6.0 | -16.5 | -22.2 | -11.0 | ||||
| Rice | -33.0 | 4.3 | -24.2 | -8.3 | -19.8 | -4.8 | -0.5 | -6.8 | 18.5 | -1.5 | -37.7 | -0.1 | ||||
| Temple | -27.9 | -22.7 | -21.8 | 0.9 | -30.1 | -5.9 | -23.4 | -23.8 | -28.5 | -17.7 | -19.1 | -14.7 | ||||
| UAB | -4.9 | -35.6 | -2.2 | -28.6 | -38.6 | -34.0 | -13.9 | 15.8 | -11.8 | -25.0 | 13.2 | -15.1 | ||||
| Florida Atlantic | -6.0 | -10.5 | 4.5 | -40.0 | -15.2 | -12.7 | -13.5 | -30.2 | -40.3 | -18.8 | -31.0 | 9.8 | ||||
| Tulsa | -22.9 | -16.4 | -48.7 | -10.4 | -32.0 | -31.8 | -27.5 | -12.0 | -62.2 | -18.1 | -36.9 | -58.2 |