Mid-American
2024 · through CFP Finals
Mid-American was the 8th-ranked FBS conference in 2024 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Ohio led the conference, ranked 46th in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 67 | 40 | 12 | 11-3 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Miami-OH | 76 | 54 | 11 | 9-5 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Bowling Green | 70 | 77 | 9 | 7-6 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Buffalo | 93 | 50 | 7 | 9-4 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Western Michigan | 102 | 89 | 10 | 6-7 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Northern Illinois | 74 | 64 | 6 | 8-5 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Toledo | 78 | 68 | 2 | 8-5 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Akron | 118 | 107 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Ball State | 126 | 120 | 5 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Central Michigan | 122 | 114 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 113 | 105 | 8 | 5-7 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Kent State | 134 | 134 | 4 | 0-12 | 0-8 | 0.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Miami-OH | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bowling Green | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Buffalo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Western Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Northern Illinois | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Toledo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Akron | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Ball State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Central Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Eastern Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Kent State | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Ohio | 52 | 42 | 72 | 103 | 20 | 57 | 67 |
| Miami-OH | 47 | 103 | 95 | 51 | 75 | 44 | 76 |
| Bowling Green | 75 | 94 | 69 | 16 | 98 | 60 | 70 |
| Buffalo | 112 | 125 | 94 | 99 | 91 | 77 | 93 |
| Western Michigan | 45 | 96 | 74 | 133 | 135 | 120 | 102 |
| Northern Illinois | 59 | 74 | 112 | 22 | 87 | 29 | 74 |
| Toledo | 100 | 128 | 108 | 34 | 82 | 48 | 78 |
| Akron | 125 | 91 | 117 | 106 | 92 | 95 | 118 |
| Ball State | 97 | 119 | 87 | 129 | 136 | 129 | 126 |
| Central Michigan | 135 | 86 | 111 | 67 | 119 | 119 | 122 |
| Eastern Michigan | 110 | 122 | 109 | 119 | 108 | 98 | 113 |
| Kent State | 89 | 127 | 127 | 132 | 138 | 133 | 134 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 10-0 | 11-3 |
| Miami-OH | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 8-1 | 9-5 |
| Bowling Green | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 6-4 | 7-6 |
| Buffalo | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 8-1 | 9-4 |
| Western Michigan | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 6-7 |
| Northern Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 6-3 | 8-5 |
| Toledo | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 5-4 | 8-5 |
| Akron | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 4-8 |
| Ball State | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 3-9 |
| Central Michigan | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 4-8 |
| Eastern Michigan | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 5-7 |
| Kent State | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-7 | 0-12 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | -10.5 | 0.1 | -19.6 | -31.8 | 0.6 | -11.3 | -13.9 | 15.0 | 2.2 | 7.1 | 16.6 | 7.6 | 30.9 | ||
| Miami-OH | -12.0 | -5.9 | 2.8 | -20.9 | -6.0 | 8.9 | 10.8 | 10.1 | -9.9 | -12.6 | 6.6 | 16.8 | -46.6 | ||
| Bowling Green | -5.2 | 18.4 | 11.7 | -7.0 | 4.6 | -14.7 | -14.7 | 15.6 | -2.8 | 11.5 | 8.1 | -20.8 | |||
| Buffalo | -13.2 | -26.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 | -33.1 | 15.7 | -18.1 | -22.3 | 1.9 | -20.3 | 5.8 | 4.2 | |||
| Western Michigan | -6.3 | -12.5 | -11.2 | -0.2 | -9.5 | -13.6 | 0.7 | -0.0 | -19.8 | -23.3 | -18.9 | -8.9 | |||
| Northern Illinois | 9.4 | 31.0 | -10.7 | -8.4 | -3.8 | 11.6 | -12.0 | -17.8 | 7.5 | -4.8 | -11.2 | -11.7 | |||
| Toledo | 7.7 | -8.3 | 29.2 | -8.3 | 0.5 | -25.5 | 7.3 | -19.7 | -10.3 | 14.4 | -19.7 | -13.6 | |||
| Akron | -5.8 | -21.3 | -29.8 | -11.7 | -14.9 | -19.8 | -10.8 | -12.2 | -22.7 | -11.0 | -4.3 | -3.1 | |||
| Ball State | -4.3 | -27.1 | -17.1 | -51.2 | -19.5 | -29.6 | -0.6 | -2.7 | -11.4 | -5.2 | -27.9 | -26.5 | |||
| Central Michigan | 5.0 | -45.0 | -11.2 | -18.1 | -18.9 | -5.7 | -12.5 | -29.5 | -15.1 | -33.8 | -8.3 | -6.8 | |||
| Eastern Michigan | 4.3 | -18.7 | -4.5 | -3.8 | -10.2 | -24.5 | -17.0 | -14.6 | -5.3 | -20.4 | -25.6 | -14.4 | |||
| Kent State | -30.9 | -46.6 | -39.5 | -18.2 | -37.0 | -23.3 | -20.8 | -44.7 | -36.8 | -24.4 | -43.9 | -45.5 |