Big Ten
2023 · through CFP Finals
Big Ten was the 4th-ranked FBS conference in 2023 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 3 teams in the top 25. Michigan led the conference, ranked 2nd in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 2 | 2 | 12 | 15-0 | 10-0 | 10.0 |
| Ohio State | 4 | 8 | 6 | 11-2 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Iowa | 52 | 26 | 14 | 10-4 | 7-3 | 7.0 |
| Penn State | 7 | 16 | 5 | 10-3 | 7-2 | 7.0 |
| Northwestern | 66 | 41 | 9 | 8-5 | 5-4 | 5.0 |
| Wisconsin | 55 | 61 | 13 | 7-6 | 5-4 | 5.0 |
| Maryland | 30 | 39 | 4 | 8-5 | 4-5 | 4.0 |
| Illinois | 75 | 83 | 11 | 5-7 | 3-6 | 3.0 |
| Minnesota | 72 | 75 | 8 | 6-7 | 3-6 | 3.0 |
| Nebraska | 64 | 89 | 10 | 5-7 | 3-6 | 3.0 |
| Purdue | 71 | 100 | 7 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 3.0 |
| Rutgers | 53 | 46 | 2 | 7-6 | 3-6 | 3.0 |
| Michigan State | 91 | 91 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-7 | 2.0 |
| Indiana | 89 | 112 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-8 | 1.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins | 10 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Ohio State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Iowa | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Penn State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Northwestern | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Wisconsin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Maryland | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Illinois | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Minnesota | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Nebraska | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Purdue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Rutgers | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Michigan State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Indiana | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Michigan | 10 | 54 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Ohio State | 6 | 27 | 15 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 4 |
| Iowa | 127 | 134 | 124 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 52 |
| Penn State | 36 | 59 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Northwestern | 67 | 106 | 76 | 60 | 52 | 59 | 66 |
| Wisconsin | 78 | 39 | 87 | 39 | 61 | 32 | 55 |
| Maryland | 23 | 55 | 22 | 18 | 64 | 37 | 30 |
| Illinois | 24 | 82 | 66 | 84 | 79 | 89 | 75 |
| Minnesota | 91 | 84 | 58 | 70 | 91 | 76 | 72 |
| Nebraska | 110 | 91 | 116 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 64 |
| Purdue | 70 | 32 | 67 | 53 | 49 | 82 | 71 |
| Rutgers | 90 | 73 | 57 | 29 | 67 | 47 | 53 |
| Michigan State | 88 | 123 | 92 | 67 | 70 | 70 | 91 |
| Indiana | 45 | 94 | 90 | 91 | 89 | 77 | 89 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 5-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 5-0 | 15-0 |
| Ohio State | 2-2 | 3-0 | 2-0 | 4-0 | 11-2 |
| Iowa | 1-3 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 5-1 | 10-4 |
| Penn State | 1-3 | 1-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 10-3 |
| Northwestern | 0-2 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 4-0 | 8-5 |
| Wisconsin | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 3-1 | 7-6 |
| Maryland | 0-3 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 5-1 | 8-5 |
| Illinois | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 5-7 |
| Minnesota | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 5-1 | 6-7 |
| Nebraska | 0-1 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 5-7 |
| Purdue | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 3-2 | 4-8 |
| Rutgers | 0-3 | 1-3 | 2-0 | 4-0 | 7-6 |
| Michigan State | 0-4 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 4-8 |
| Indiana | 0-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 3-9 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 23.2 | 30.3 | 19.6 | 29.5 | 34.3 | 22.7 | 29.5 | 33.8 | 20.3 | 34.6 | 20.1 | 30.4 | 26.8 | |
| Ohio State | 19.0 | 19.6 | 33.3 | 28.2 | 26.5 | 32.1 | 27.5 | 19.5 | 25.5 | 27.5 | 29.3 | 24.1 | ||
| Iowa | 1.6 | 21.2 | 2.1 | -4.4 | -0.7 | 0.6 | 13.3 | -7.2 | 2.2 | 23.2 | -3.3 | 4.5 | 5.8 | |
| Penn State | 28.5 | 30.3 | 18.1 | 30.1 | 26.5 | 24.7 | 20.2 | -0.5 | 38.6 | 16.9 | 22.8 | 30.0 | ||
| Northwestern | -20.9 | 9.1 | -19.0 | -3.4 | -5.0 | -25.6 | -5.0 | 13.6 | 0.3 | 27.2 | 2.6 | -4.4 | ||
| Wisconsin | 2.6 | -1.5 | 8.2 | 21.2 | 14.5 | -7.3 | 2.2 | 8.5 | -8.3 | -29.4 | -1.0 | 13.7 | ||
| Maryland | 7.0 | -1.9 | 16.5 | 18.1 | 23.2 | 8.2 | -7.6 | -5.1 | -15.1 | 5.6 | 18.6 | 22.5 | ||
| Illinois | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | -6.4 | -28.8 | -14.9 | 14.1 | -2.5 | -0.1 | -6.1 | 3.7 | 0.5 | ||
| Minnesota | 0.3 | -3.3 | -7.8 | -0.2 | 7.2 | 3.9 | 7.9 | 4.2 | -5.6 | -23.3 | -6.7 | -13.7 | ||
| Nebraska | -3.2 | -19.9 | 13.4 | -3.1 | -18.4 | 11.7 | 3.9 | 14.3 | -7.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | -1.4 | ||
| Purdue | -8.1 | 15.7 | -23.5 | -21.0 | 23.3 | 0.3 | -16.5 | -17.0 | 6.4 | 18.1 | -5.9 | -1.7 | ||
| Rutgers | 22.9 | -0.1 | 19.8 | -1.0 | -3.7 | -9.0 | -5.6 | 15.5 | 2.6 | -17.0 | 2.4 | -10.2 | ||
| Michigan State | 6.2 | 8.8 | -21.8 | -15.3 | -2.7 | 1.7 | -16.3 | -13.6 | 0.4 | -14.2 | 0.5 | -14.4 | ||
| Indiana | 1.1 | -3.4 | 3.1 | -24.0 | -18.9 | -5.4 | -17.8 | 17.7 | 5.8 | -2.0 | -12.4 | -5.9 |