Mid-American
2025 · through CFP Finals
Mid-American was the 11th-ranked FBS conference in 2025 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Western Michigan led the conference, ranked 50th in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Michigan | 70 | 46 | 13 | 10-4 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Miami-OH | 89 | 90 | 12 | 7-7 | 6-3 | 6.0 |
| Ohio | 79 | 52 | 10 | 9-4 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Toledo | 45 | 65 | 7 | 8-5 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Central Michigan | 95 | 77 | 4 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Akron | 127 | 103 | 5 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Buffalo | 119 | 104 | 11 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Kent State | 131 | 97 | 9 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Ball State | 133 | 112 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 126 | 120 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Bowling Green | 124 | 117 | 6 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Northern Illinois | 125 | 125 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 2.0 |
| Massachusetts | 136 | 136 | 8 | 0-12 | 0-8 | 0.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Miami-OH | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Toledo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Central Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Akron | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Buffalo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Kent State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Ball State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Eastern Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Bowling Green | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Northern Illinois | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Massachusetts | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Western Michigan | 117 | 71 | 93 | 37 | 72 | 45 | 70 |
| Miami-OH | 89 | 103 | 100 | 72 | 75 | 63 | 89 |
| Ohio | 73 | 49 | 69 | 85 | 99 | 88 | 79 |
| Toledo | 39 | 73 | 59 | 20 | 21 | 39 | 45 |
| Central Michigan | 56 | 108 | 92 | 77 | 95 | 94 | 95 |
| Akron | 110 | 131 | 128 | 99 | 122 | 108 | 127 |
| Buffalo | 116 | 136 | 130 | 87 | 92 | 84 | 119 |
| Kent State | 72 | 128 | 110 | 122 | 120 | 131 | 131 |
| Ball State | 135 | 124 | 133 | 119 | 126 | 115 | 133 |
| Eastern Michigan | 87 | 91 | 105 | 134 | 130 | 132 | 126 |
| Bowling Green | 131 | 133 | 131 | 98 | 94 | 103 | 124 |
| Northern Illinois | 137 | 112 | 129 | 86 | 100 | 113 | 125 |
| Massachusetts | 134 | 134 | 134 | 138 | 133 | 136 | 136 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Michigan | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 9-0 | 10-4 |
| Miami-OH | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-5 | 7-2 | 7-7 |
| Ohio | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 8-1 | 9-4 |
| Toledo | 0-0 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 8-5 |
| Central Michigan | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 7-1 | 7-6 |
| Akron | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 5-7 |
| Buffalo | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 5-7 |
| Kent State | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 5-7 |
| Ball State | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 4-2 | 4-8 |
| Eastern Michigan | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 4-8 |
| Bowling Green | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 4-8 |
| Northern Illinois | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 3-9 |
| Massachusetts | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-9 | 0-12 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Michigan | -30.0 | 3.4 | -18.6 | 4.8 | 21.3 | -13.0 | 13.1 | -14.3 | -7.7 | -2.6 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 2.6 | ||
| Miami-OH | -14.6 | -24.5 | -9.3 | 3.0 | -3.7 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 7.7 | 1.9 | -22.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | -9.3 | ||
| Ohio | 3.0 | -1.6 | 5.3 | -10.5 | -4.5 | -24.3 | 17.1 | -8.0 | -11.9 | -1.3 | -12.9 | -8.2 | |||
| Toledo | -1.5 | 24.4 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 23.0 | -18.3 | 7.8 | -14.2 | 8.9 | 22.7 | 3.2 | 12.7 | |||
| Central Michigan | -9.3 | -13.3 | -26.6 | 8.7 | -9.7 | -21.1 | 12.2 | -9.0 | -1.0 | 2.9 | -1.5 | -15.1 | |||
| Akron | -23.8 | -38.2 | -14.8 | 3.3 | -35.1 | -5.6 | -24.6 | -29.4 | -5.0 | -8.8 | -25.8 | -11.0 | |||
| Buffalo | -10.2 | -9.5 | -15.1 | -14.9 | -10.3 | -19.6 | -24.8 | -28.9 | 6.8 | -27.1 | -23.9 | -11.1 | |||
| Kent State | -32.0 | -23.1 | -21.2 | -30.9 | -23.4 | -4.9 | -22.2 | -15.6 | -23.6 | -12.9 | -27.5 | -9.1 | |||
| Ball State | -34.6 | -22.8 | -16.8 | -9.7 | -1.0 | -35.1 | -10.5 | -25.3 | -18.5 | -37.2 | -18.7 | -29.7 | |||
| Eastern Michigan | -25.6 | -38.9 | -20.0 | -12.3 | -16.7 | -14.0 | -13.5 | -25.9 | -13.5 | -12.4 | -2.3 | -19.8 | |||
| Bowling Green | -7.5 | -16.1 | -3.8 | -17.8 | -16.5 | 7.1 | -38.0 | -22.2 | -39.9 | -22.9 | -24.5 | -6.6 | |||
| Northern Illinois | -29.6 | -9.2 | -19.6 | -0.7 | -19.9 | -21.8 | -38.1 | -13.7 | -20.2 | 14.9 | -21.9 | -28.8 | |||
| Massachusetts | -39.6 | -36.8 | -19.9 | -15.4 | -24.3 | -52.6 | -27.8 | -36.3 | -46.4 | -69.2 | -27.6 | -47.6 |