Mid-American
2023 · through CFP Finals
Mid-American was the 11th-ranked FBS conference in 2023 by average FanBoardHQ CFP rankings, with 0 teams in the top 25. Toledo led the conference, ranked 43rd in the FanBoardHQ CFP.
Projected Standings
Every member ordered by projected conference win total — per-game win probabilities combined across each team’s conference schedule. Click any column to re-sort.
| Team | Efficiency rank | SOR rank | Conf. sched. rank | Overall record | Conf. record | Proj. conf. wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami-OH | 70 | 37 | 11 | 11-3 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Toledo | 60 | 40 | 12 | 11-3 | 8-1 | 8.0 |
| Ohio | 77 | 43 | 8 | 10-3 | 6-2 | 6.0 |
| Bowling Green | 83 | 72 | 6 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Northern Illinois | 94 | 82 | 10 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 5.0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 129 | 95 | 9 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 4.0 |
| Ball State | 116 | 110 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Buffalo | 122 | 127 | 2 | 3-9 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Central Michigan | 117 | 98 | 7 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Western Michigan | 123 | 115 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 3.0 |
| Akron | 131 | 132 | 4 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 1.0 |
| Kent State | 133 | 133 | 5 | 1-11 | 0-8 | 0.0 |
Head-to-head Schedule Comparison
Read a column top to bottom for that team’s full conference schedule — opponents (the rows) are ordered by projected conference wins, so you can see whether a team drew more of the top or the bottom of the league. Cell shade = margin; click a result for the game breakdown, a “Wk N” cell for the matchup projection.
Conference win total projections
Probability of each final conference win total, from per-game win probabilities combined across the schedule. Darker green = more likely; each team’s single most likely total is in bold.
| Team | 0 wins | 1 win | 2 wins | 3 wins | 4 wins | 5 wins | 6 wins | 7 wins | 8 wins | 9 wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami-OH | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Toledo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Bowling Green | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Northern Illinois | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Eastern Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Ball State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Buffalo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Central Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Western Michigan | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Akron | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Kent State | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Every model rank
Where each member sits in every FanBoardHQ model. Default order is projected conference wins; click any column to re-sort. Pass/Rush Eff blend EPA/play, success rate, and yards/play, standardized over the FBS field.
| Offensive Eff | Defensive Eff | Overall Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Pass O Eff | Rush O Eff | Total Off Eff | Pass D Eff | Rush D Eff | Total Def Eff | Overall Eff |
| Miami-OH | 83 | 121 | 109 | 57 | 39 | 26 | 70 |
| Toledo | 37 | 33 | 61 | 22 | 42 | 62 | 60 |
| Ohio | 51 | 130 | 101 | 66 | 19 | 38 | 77 |
| Bowling Green | 99 | 51 | 70 | 23 | 99 | 94 | 83 |
| Northern Illinois | 102 | 47 | 103 | 85 | 101 | 69 | 94 |
| Eastern Michigan | 137 | 132 | 129 | 124 | 112 | 103 | 129 |
| Ball State | 133 | 78 | 123 | 101 | 48 | 92 | 116 |
| Buffalo | 122 | 114 | 122 | 86 | 65 | 114 | 122 |
| Central Michigan | 119 | 72 | 102 | 115 | 126 | 124 | 117 |
| Western Michigan | 113 | 85 | 97 | 128 | 123 | 127 | 123 |
| Akron | 135 | 99 | 131 | 87 | 96 | 119 | 131 |
| Kent State | 106 | 138 | 126 | 136 | 111 | 133 | 133 |
Compare teams
Pick up to three teams to compare their strengths across every model.
Further from center = better (FBS percentile).
Quadrant records
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami-OH | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 8-0 | 11-3 |
| Toledo | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 8-0 | 11-3 |
| Ohio | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 8-3 | 10-3 |
| Bowling Green | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 6-1 | 7-6 |
| Northern Illinois | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 7-6 |
| Eastern Michigan | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 6-3 | 6-7 |
| Ball State | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 4-8 |
| Buffalo | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 3-9 |
| Central Michigan | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 5-7 |
| Western Michigan | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 4-3 | 4-8 |
| Akron | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 2-6 | 2-10 |
| Kent State | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-7 | 1-11 |
Weekly GameScore Efficiency Rating
Each team's single-game GameScore, week by week — points better (or worse) than an average team, opponent-adjusted. Green = strong, red = weak, centered at 0. Click a week header to rank that week’s performances, or a cell for that game.
| Team | Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami-OH | -17.7 | -4.9 | 0.2 | -18.5 | -7.2 | 26.6 | -1.0 | -5.8 | 16.0 | -6.6 | -7.0 | -14.3 | 10.1 | ||
| Toledo | -4.3 | 15.3 | 4.8 | -4.8 | -10.0 | 0.4 | -3.9 | 4.6 | -6.0 | 18.0 | -0.2 | 3.9 | -11.4 | ||
| Ohio | -14.7 | -11.6 | -0.5 | 11.0 | 30.4 | -5.5 | -16.5 | -17.4 | -21.4 | 0.8 | -4.3 | -9.8 | |||
| Bowling Green | 1.5 | 0.7 | 5.2 | -43.8 | 24.4 | -34.2 | -7.8 | 0.9 | -13.4 | -0.7 | -3.5 | 21.0 | |||
| Northern Illinois | -1.3 | -7.3 | -21.3 | -25.0 | 3.2 | 16.2 | 5.6 | -15.6 | -19.3 | -21.0 | 9.0 | -16.9 | |||
| Eastern Michigan | -22.6 | -20.6 | -19.6 | -23.1 | -14.0 | -3.6 | -17.0 | -13.2 | -38.8 | -43.0 | -24.7 | 1.7 | |||
| Ball State | -16.3 | -15.3 | -4.1 | -44.3 | -33.5 | -32.8 | -10.5 | -10.5 | -6.3 | -1.8 | -3.7 | -3.0 | |||
| Buffalo | -16.9 | -23.1 | -19.7 | -14.7 | -19.2 | -2.6 | -13.7 | -10.8 | -10.2 | -21.0 | -12.1 | -39.9 | |||
| Central Michigan | -28.1 | -14.7 | 0.1 | 12.3 | -22.5 | -29.7 | -19.1 | -20.0 | -3.6 | -25.6 | -14.3 | -18.4 | |||
| Western Michigan | -15.4 | -46.4 | -16.5 | -12.2 | 0.5 | -15.4 | -18.8 | -3.6 | -0.2 | -7.5 | -34.4 | -43.3 | |||
| Akron | -21.3 | -35.1 | -19.9 | -4.0 | -20.7 | -46.8 | -19.1 | -28.3 | -25.6 | -18.4 | -19.5 | -16.3 | |||
| Kent State | -32.4 | -24.8 | -16.8 | -41.7 | -25.4 | -28.2 | -34.6 | -36.6 | -27.8 | -34.3 | -41.9 | -21.2 |